Anonymous
7/19/2025, 2:07:01 AM
No.17853373
>>17853362
>As such, Marxism posits that the monkeys who arent rich and dont own things also have a shared material interest with each other the same way the rich monkeys do, and posits a theoretical manor in which the poor monkeys will supplant the rich bourgeoisie monkeys just as the bourgeoisie monkeys supplanted the aristocratic monkeys in the french revolution
You've already made a grave mistake here. It's not even about being rich or poor, it's about the levers of power, mostly via production, that induce social ills. Certain levers of power should be democratized was Marx's argument.
>As such, Marxism posits that the monkeys who arent rich and dont own things also have a shared material interest with each other the same way the rich monkeys do, and posits a theoretical manor in which the poor monkeys will supplant the rich bourgeoisie monkeys just as the bourgeoisie monkeys supplanted the aristocratic monkeys in the french revolution
You've already made a grave mistake here. It's not even about being rich or poor, it's about the levers of power, mostly via production, that induce social ills. Certain levers of power should be democratized was Marx's argument.