Anonymous
7/24/2025, 5:02:14 PM
No.7662034
>>7662026
>NTA. You simultaneously claimed that rights don't exist and then turned around and said this, which would imply you don't believe in legal positivism. So either you made an unintentional contradiction or you're a nihilist.
it's called an internal critique. you don't have to say anything of your own worldview in order to critique another's. if the anon believes that the Supreme Court is fallible, which they likely do, then saying "well (right now) x is legal, so it is in fact free speech" would contradict their own worldview.
>NTA. You simultaneously claimed that rights don't exist and then turned around and said this, which would imply you don't believe in legal positivism. So either you made an unintentional contradiction or you're a nihilist.
it's called an internal critique. you don't have to say anything of your own worldview in order to critique another's. if the anon believes that the Supreme Court is fallible, which they likely do, then saying "well (right now) x is legal, so it is in fact free speech" would contradict their own worldview.