Anonymous
7/27/2025, 7:20:41 PM
No.7667071
>>7667060
>So, in order to act on reason, it can be derived that man must have exclusive control of his own body, else it would be impossible
even if you grant that, that would not then justify that we ought to act on reason, or at least try. no matter how logically coherent you try to make your system - even if you succeed - it cannot justify itself. "if we want to do x...." cool, but why ought we, without using circular reasoning, want to or strive to act in such a manner. that in order to act you necessarily assume some sort of value system has never been in dispute, and doesn't ground your ethic.
>So, in order to act on reason, it can be derived that man must have exclusive control of his own body, else it would be impossible
even if you grant that, that would not then justify that we ought to act on reason, or at least try. no matter how logically coherent you try to make your system - even if you succeed - it cannot justify itself. "if we want to do x...." cool, but why ought we, without using circular reasoning, want to or strive to act in such a manner. that in order to act you necessarily assume some sort of value system has never been in dispute, and doesn't ground your ethic.