Anonymous
10/29/2025, 9:56:19 PM
No.7776717
>>7776679
When I said art, what I was referring to was high-art, which has and still is in the control of the rich, rather the definition of what high-art is has changed. The plebs have always had their own "low" art created by and for the masses, and what was once considered high (e.g. neo-classical) has migrated to low, and something new has taken its place.
So I don't think high-art, at least, has been democratized since it's always been in the purview of the rich.
When I said art, what I was referring to was high-art, which has and still is in the control of the rich, rather the definition of what high-art is has changed. The plebs have always had their own "low" art created by and for the masses, and what was once considered high (e.g. neo-classical) has migrated to low, and something new has taken its place.
So I don't think high-art, at least, has been democratized since it's always been in the purview of the rich.