>>9966
I mean there's nothing stopping the mods from just ignoring it if it's clearly irrelevant bullshit, or maybe calling out jannies that abuse it too much if necessary to quit wasting everybody's time.
>>9967
I think not every violation of the rules, even "obvious" ones, will necessarily be 100% clear from a single post taken in a vacuum though. I mean to give an example I'm a /vt/ janny so doxx/IRL stuff comes up a lot that sometimes requires a bit of background knowledge of the people involved to know what is and isn't referencing such info, being able to make a quick note so the mod understands what they're seeing could be helpful. Also things like recurring trolls that have been doing the same schtick for weeks/months might seem to only deserve a warning based on the single post taken in a vacuum but should probably be noted if they've been doing the same thing for a while. Of course mods can determine that stuff on their own with some investigation, but there's some possibility for the janitor to save them some time and just explain their reasoning up front if they don't think it will be immediately obvious.