>>63805645
"National technical means" is inclusive of more than just satint, especially by the time of New START. That says nothing that hangers are not a full impediment to SATINT. This says nothing that hangers could be used for something more than monitoring impediment. This says nothing for hangers that could be constructed in such a way as to not interfere. This says nothing that Russia was already using hangers. This says nothing for Russia having willfully withdrawn from the treaty several years ago.

What say you? Or is the only thing you have the ability to ctrl+f on the "key phrase" your handlers gave you and no actual understanding of the underlying ideas?