>>63856468
>Would aerosolizing radiation dust be a viable weapon?
no
>You'd want them to explode the missiles over cities. Just give everyone living there terminal cancer.
this isn't how cancer or radiation works
>I mean, PR wise, you can't show anything shocking. Just numbers on a page about this or that "level".

dirty bombs aren't that effective, you would have at most hundreds of deaths maybe if you are lucky and accurate