Anonymous
7/3/2025, 11:35:26 PM
No.63934933
>Now both the T-7 and the T-50A for the USN bid are developing it, but it's not something present on current T-7 nor on current T50s operated by any air force.
You know the winner of T-X was announced back in 2018. The only reason why it still hasn't been introduced yet is because Boeing is doing its usual shits.
>Maintenance of 2 f124 engines in this case is slightly higher than a non afterburning F404, and lower than an afterburning F404.
Oh really? May I see the data proving that please?
>Fuel consumption is significantly less for the twin f124 compared to both versions of the F404. Overall, the m346 is 20-30% cheaper to fly than a jet like the current T50. This doesn't include just fuel costs
Again, all talks, no proof. It's all tiresome, Anon.
>I meant thatyou literally reinforced my point.
What makes you think that way?
You know the winner of T-X was announced back in 2018. The only reason why it still hasn't been introduced yet is because Boeing is doing its usual shits.
>Maintenance of 2 f124 engines in this case is slightly higher than a non afterburning F404, and lower than an afterburning F404.
Oh really? May I see the data proving that please?
>Fuel consumption is significantly less for the twin f124 compared to both versions of the F404. Overall, the m346 is 20-30% cheaper to fly than a jet like the current T50. This doesn't include just fuel costs
Again, all talks, no proof. It's all tiresome, Anon.
>I meant thatyou literally reinforced my point.
What makes you think that way?