KM
!hgcMxFhLmk
8/17/2025, 2:27:40 PM
No.64132433
>>64132421
And I got the images out of order. So here's that one, and that was a pair of qi axes. The round one late Xia to early Shang dynasty (1800-1300 BC) and the bottom one Shang dynasty (1600-1046 BC).
The round one would be mounted just like the "normal" ones, with the rightmost part of the circle acting as the tang.
And I got the images out of order. So here's that one, and that was a pair of qi axes. The round one late Xia to early Shang dynasty (1800-1300 BC) and the bottom one Shang dynasty (1600-1046 BC).
The round one would be mounted just like the "normal" ones, with the rightmost part of the circle acting as the tang.