>>64160028
Alright bunkercuck

>>64159829
>Not fuel, not water, not timelimit on filters or presence in the vehicle.
Right here for a start, when you just outright discount any logistical needs snd assume the Soviets will always be have what they need.
>ground zeroes of tactical nukes dropped on NATO formations.
And of course, all NATO formations already took a nuking and are now reduced to scattered pockets.... weird how the soviet formations remain fully formed and un-nuked.
>>64159573
There is also this post where you go into histrionics and claim that no bridges would be blown because NATO forces attacking over them would then need to retreat in close contact with Soviets. Ignoring that A) it takes a second to blow a bridge once rigged, and B) by your own measure, the NATO formations have already been nooknooked into oblivion.

There's plenty more examples, like how the soviet wonder trains will magically roll across Europe regardless of track gauge, and somehow none of the rail choke points will be taken out, or if they are the soviet engineer teams will just instantly repair them, whilst all Western logistics break down and their rail lines run into disarray. Or how the roads will be clear fir the ruskie push, and they will have all the fuel, but the NATO forces will have to cope with congested roads and no fuel supplies.
Just admit it, troony, your a bunkercuck and your giving every advantage to the Soviets and none to the West