Anonymous
10/20/2025, 10:42:29 PM
No.64422755
>>64422730
>but my math for the 100% hit circle is still correct
It literally isn't because you invent a bunch of variables that aren't in the table, based entirely on the wrong interpretation of the basic measurement concept.
When it says "average" deviation of 1.4cm, it really means that the bullet will land 1.4cm away from point of aim 50% of the time, and it clarifies that this is horizontal deviation, as vertical deviation is different, creating an oval instead of a circle.
>but my math for the 100% hit circle is still correct
It literally isn't because you invent a bunch of variables that aren't in the table, based entirely on the wrong interpretation of the basic measurement concept.
When it says "average" deviation of 1.4cm, it really means that the bullet will land 1.4cm away from point of aim 50% of the time, and it clarifies that this is horizontal deviation, as vertical deviation is different, creating an oval instead of a circle.