Anonymous
11/1/2025, 12:04:23 PM
No.64468155
>>64467619
I tried to read the whole thread but I'll be honest, anon. Your problem is you don't actually know anything about nuclear weapons and probably didn't begin researching them until very recently, probably because of this weird pet theory you have.
You're posting this shit to a board full of people that've probably been sampling videos of Buster Jangle, Upshot Knothole, Castle Yankee, etc. since we were 9 years old.
This is no different than war tourists that think they know the future of warfare because they've binged enough Simon Wistler videos on youtube since the invasion kicked off. You barely understand the thing you're desperately trying to convince - if not experts (lmao, even) - fervent observers was used in an event that bears none of the *INCONTROVERTIBLE* signs of a nuclear event.
>Where's the double flash? We still have Vela Incident memes till this day, but no one reported nuclear detection sats pinging an unmistakable double-flash signature?
>Where's the ionizing radiation flash-igniting trees AND THE FILMER as the fireball rises?
>Why is the fireball not SEARING, PIERCING white before slowly reducing in luminance as the the fireball expands and rises?
I bet you thought those videos of nuke tests were shot with normal, standard lens cameras, too?
>Where is the telltale pulse of x-ray at the immediate start of the detonation (*should* leave an unmistakable video artifact as a result of the rays interacting with the camera).
>Same question about the lack of visual noise to the picture, which would happen due to the fast release of certain ionizing rays that come in extremely fast immediately after initial detonation (less than 1-2 seconds from device initiation, usually).
I definitely half-assed explaining some of this shit, but it all comes to mind in the first place because I know I've encountered the info endlessly since I was a kid.
Your customer support chat bot skills aren't helping you understand what you kinda need to just know.
I tried to read the whole thread but I'll be honest, anon. Your problem is you don't actually know anything about nuclear weapons and probably didn't begin researching them until very recently, probably because of this weird pet theory you have.
You're posting this shit to a board full of people that've probably been sampling videos of Buster Jangle, Upshot Knothole, Castle Yankee, etc. since we were 9 years old.
This is no different than war tourists that think they know the future of warfare because they've binged enough Simon Wistler videos on youtube since the invasion kicked off. You barely understand the thing you're desperately trying to convince - if not experts (lmao, even) - fervent observers was used in an event that bears none of the *INCONTROVERTIBLE* signs of a nuclear event.
>Where's the double flash? We still have Vela Incident memes till this day, but no one reported nuclear detection sats pinging an unmistakable double-flash signature?
>Where's the ionizing radiation flash-igniting trees AND THE FILMER as the fireball rises?
>Why is the fireball not SEARING, PIERCING white before slowly reducing in luminance as the the fireball expands and rises?
I bet you thought those videos of nuke tests were shot with normal, standard lens cameras, too?
>Where is the telltale pulse of x-ray at the immediate start of the detonation (*should* leave an unmistakable video artifact as a result of the rays interacting with the camera).
>Same question about the lack of visual noise to the picture, which would happen due to the fast release of certain ionizing rays that come in extremely fast immediately after initial detonation (less than 1-2 seconds from device initiation, usually).
I definitely half-assed explaining some of this shit, but it all comes to mind in the first place because I know I've encountered the info endlessly since I was a kid.
Your customer support chat bot skills aren't helping you understand what you kinda need to just know.