>>24492160
Where was your argument? The entire thing was devoid of any form of argument besides empty statements like "it's bad", "it didn't produce", or "it isn't real", each one without substance or applicable to many other parts of intellectual thought. Your GPT contradicts itself here >>24492157 where your OP references this form of Oneness and the multiplicity of truth in doctrines. You aren't really saying anything, but these empty statements can make you feel like you aren't an imbecile.

Write a genuine, full criticism of theology or what have you and you'll get a serious reply. Use ChatGPT. I know you cannot write without it, and you do not understand enough to write regardless. Just have it write an essay and post it here.