Anonymous
6/24/2025, 1:25:10 PM
No.24492307
>>24492300
You've now reduced your defense of theology to, “You can’t prove it’s worse than anything else.” That’s not a refutation — that’s surrender. You’re not making a case for theology; you’re just insisting I can’t disprove it absolutely, as if “not falsified” equals “intellectually valid.” By that standard, flat earth theory’s still in the ring too.
What you call a contradiction is actually clarity: I’m pointing out that theology doesn’t produce insight, resolution, or progress because it’s built to preserve ambiguity, not resolve it. Your response? Admit that no system does — a relativist escape hatch. You’ve abandoned truth entirely just to protect your belief from criticism. That’s not a rebuttal. That’s a retreat behind fog.
You’ve abandoned any claim that theology reveals truth, and now you’re just clawing at symmetry: “Well, nothing else produces truth either!” That’s not clever — it’s a concession. You're not rebutting me, you're just dragging everything down to theology's level to hide the collapse.
You accuse me of ego, yet you're the one raging to preserve a system that can't stand on its own unless every other framework is declared equally useless. That’s the last refuge of someone who’s lost the thread: if it can’t win, it demands the whole board get flipped.
You've now reduced your defense of theology to, “You can’t prove it’s worse than anything else.” That’s not a refutation — that’s surrender. You’re not making a case for theology; you’re just insisting I can’t disprove it absolutely, as if “not falsified” equals “intellectually valid.” By that standard, flat earth theory’s still in the ring too.
What you call a contradiction is actually clarity: I’m pointing out that theology doesn’t produce insight, resolution, or progress because it’s built to preserve ambiguity, not resolve it. Your response? Admit that no system does — a relativist escape hatch. You’ve abandoned truth entirely just to protect your belief from criticism. That’s not a rebuttal. That’s a retreat behind fog.
You’ve abandoned any claim that theology reveals truth, and now you’re just clawing at symmetry: “Well, nothing else produces truth either!” That’s not clever — it’s a concession. You're not rebutting me, you're just dragging everything down to theology's level to hide the collapse.
You accuse me of ego, yet you're the one raging to preserve a system that can't stand on its own unless every other framework is declared equally useless. That’s the last refuge of someone who’s lost the thread: if it can’t win, it demands the whole board get flipped.