Anonymous
6/24/2025, 2:13:42 PM
No.24492377
>>24492316
>quality of the debate depends entirely on their own input and understanding.
>the user isn’t wielding it wisely.
It is evident that yours is sorely lacking as well. Just as he, you greatly overestimate your extremely low level of intelligence and knowledge. When you are as ignorant as you are, it's very difficult to dig yourself out, and reading from your superiors or religious texts like ChatGPT is a good way to avoid learning at all.
>real challenge is in human intellect — which AI only amplifies, for better or worse.
Yes, quite the amplification in your case.
The AI also fails to understand that I wasn't criticizing AI itself, but a specific case: when it is wrong or nonsense, as in your case, users like you fail to realize because, ultimately, you do not have enough understanding to determine the validity of what the LLM outputs. You are the human error.
Again, just as he, you will never be able to understand that everything you are posting is a misunderstanding spawned from your own ineptitude, wrong, or meaningless. No thought will ever pass through your head. No rationality exists in you. Here, just as with any inept ChatGPT user, you are soundly refuted and can just receive another prompt to continue.
Instead, try inputting the conversation and ask it for a genuine opinion on whose points are stronger and more valid. See if your God considers you to be in the right; I give you my guarantee that it will tell you your arguments fail.
>quality of the debate depends entirely on their own input and understanding.
>the user isn’t wielding it wisely.
It is evident that yours is sorely lacking as well. Just as he, you greatly overestimate your extremely low level of intelligence and knowledge. When you are as ignorant as you are, it's very difficult to dig yourself out, and reading from your superiors or religious texts like ChatGPT is a good way to avoid learning at all.
>real challenge is in human intellect — which AI only amplifies, for better or worse.
Yes, quite the amplification in your case.
The AI also fails to understand that I wasn't criticizing AI itself, but a specific case: when it is wrong or nonsense, as in your case, users like you fail to realize because, ultimately, you do not have enough understanding to determine the validity of what the LLM outputs. You are the human error.
Again, just as he, you will never be able to understand that everything you are posting is a misunderstanding spawned from your own ineptitude, wrong, or meaningless. No thought will ever pass through your head. No rationality exists in you. Here, just as with any inept ChatGPT user, you are soundly refuted and can just receive another prompt to continue.
Instead, try inputting the conversation and ask it for a genuine opinion on whose points are stronger and more valid. See if your God considers you to be in the right; I give you my guarantee that it will tell you your arguments fail.