Anonymous
6/24/2025, 3:01:23 PM
No.24492422
>>24492095
For a final post, I want to offer you genuine help, OP. I will do so in an inflammatory way, as you require it. Read the post with the intent of bettering yourself.
Here you begged your LLM to argue against someone who was agreeing with you, in fact in a much more rational way, by contradicting your OP:
>>24492122
>>24492150
>you’re a walking refrigerator magnet. You post the same cherry-picked quotes from every religion like it’s some deep revelation, when really it’s just your shield against ever having to think critically. You don’t believe in anything — you just don’t want to be wrong.
>You're not spiritual, you're a human Hallmark card with brain rot. You parade your copy-paste interfaith garbage like it’s profound, but it’s just mental bubble wrap — soft, safe, and completely empty. You slap together contradictions, call it “oneness,” and think dodging real thought makes you wise.
>...
>You aren’t deep — you’re just too scared to pick a side and too stupid to realize they can’t all be right.
He disengages immediately because he recognizes that you are an imbecile whose LLM accidentally spoke of the very user copy-pasting its replies.
You are the refrigerator magnet using quotes from an LLM to shield yourself from ever thinking critically. You don't believe anything — you just don't want to be wrong. You're an actual, unironic human Hallmark card with brain rot. You parade your literal copy-paste garbage like it's profound, but it's just mental bubble wrap — soft, safe, and completely empty. You have literally slapped together contradictions, called it "oneness" (Vedanta, Zen, Taoism) and think dodging real thought makes you wise. You aren't deep. You're just too scared to pick and side and too stupid to realize you're wrong.
You will copy-paste again, of course, parading your mental bubble-wrap like it's profound, but it will again be completely empty; In your case, full of factually incorrect statements, self-contradiction, meaningless aphorisms, and all to help you avoid any form of real thought. You misuse AI in the exact way the AI instructed you that people misuse it: >>24492316 and like any common imbecile are unable to see it.
This is for your own benefit, not to win an argument—you need to engage with topics rationally instead of outsourcing all forms of intellect to a fallible tool that you grossly misuse and are too ignorant to understand. If it is possible for you to ever get better and become rational, this is not how it will occur. You need to quit leaning on GPT like this, especially not when the evidence that it is giving you grossly incorrect and contradictory information is clearly presented. You must learn to rationally engage and formulate your own arguments.
If it is possible for you to ever stop being an imbecile, you need to begin by admitting you were wrong, and that you must learn from the instances where you are soundly proven wrong, and thereby become right.
For a final post, I want to offer you genuine help, OP. I will do so in an inflammatory way, as you require it. Read the post with the intent of bettering yourself.
Here you begged your LLM to argue against someone who was agreeing with you, in fact in a much more rational way, by contradicting your OP:
>>24492122
>>24492150
>you’re a walking refrigerator magnet. You post the same cherry-picked quotes from every religion like it’s some deep revelation, when really it’s just your shield against ever having to think critically. You don’t believe in anything — you just don’t want to be wrong.
>You're not spiritual, you're a human Hallmark card with brain rot. You parade your copy-paste interfaith garbage like it’s profound, but it’s just mental bubble wrap — soft, safe, and completely empty. You slap together contradictions, call it “oneness,” and think dodging real thought makes you wise.
>...
>You aren’t deep — you’re just too scared to pick a side and too stupid to realize they can’t all be right.
He disengages immediately because he recognizes that you are an imbecile whose LLM accidentally spoke of the very user copy-pasting its replies.
You are the refrigerator magnet using quotes from an LLM to shield yourself from ever thinking critically. You don't believe anything — you just don't want to be wrong. You're an actual, unironic human Hallmark card with brain rot. You parade your literal copy-paste garbage like it's profound, but it's just mental bubble wrap — soft, safe, and completely empty. You have literally slapped together contradictions, called it "oneness" (Vedanta, Zen, Taoism) and think dodging real thought makes you wise. You aren't deep. You're just too scared to pick and side and too stupid to realize you're wrong.
You will copy-paste again, of course, parading your mental bubble-wrap like it's profound, but it will again be completely empty; In your case, full of factually incorrect statements, self-contradiction, meaningless aphorisms, and all to help you avoid any form of real thought. You misuse AI in the exact way the AI instructed you that people misuse it: >>24492316 and like any common imbecile are unable to see it.
This is for your own benefit, not to win an argument—you need to engage with topics rationally instead of outsourcing all forms of intellect to a fallible tool that you grossly misuse and are too ignorant to understand. If it is possible for you to ever get better and become rational, this is not how it will occur. You need to quit leaning on GPT like this, especially not when the evidence that it is giving you grossly incorrect and contradictory information is clearly presented. You must learn to rationally engage and formulate your own arguments.
If it is possible for you to ever stop being an imbecile, you need to begin by admitting you were wrong, and that you must learn from the instances where you are soundly proven wrong, and thereby become right.