>>24494607
If I were breathing it like a drooling retard, certainly. It's no surprise that someone with your reading comprehension failed to utilize ChatGPT.
However, entertaining your attempt at a refutation, since we are English speaking, the two countries with the largest English speaking populations are the U.S.A and India.
>USA: 299,270,000
>India: 228,539,090
For China, that number is
>"10,000,000"
A separate number is "300,000,000", but this is only for "learners", not those that have conversational capability. This means that there is a near equal chance for you or I to be American or Indian (and Chinese if I use the highest possible number that the data allows, including every kindergartener that learns to say "Hey me see you"). Now let's apply the ChatGPT usage rates:
>USA: 299,270,000 * 0.23 = 68,832,100
>India: 228,539,090 * 0.45 = 102,842,590.5
>China: 300,000,000 * 0.18 = 54,000,000
That means statistically it is most likely for an English speaker on the internet using ChatGPT like this to be Indian, based on pure numbers. However, the only thing that definitively indicates you're a pajeet are your low IQ, fluency, knowledge, and skill. Want more statistics or have I driven this point far enough?

Avoid speaking at all if you're less intelligent than a GPT model.