>>24565531
Anon what do you expect from an analogy? Do you think it should be a like for like, one to one, comparison? Should I say eating a burger is analogous to eating McDonalds? Of course they will diverge but the premise is the same. Both parties are unconscious and being acted upon without consent.

Your argument is
>durr the analogy fails because it's not an identical comparison

Maybe the analogy of necrophilia would work better. Do you think it's ok to have sex with a dead body because the person is non-existent?