I forget who it is, but it's like the #1 guy in contemporary NT scholarship and the historical case for a resurrection
his conclusion is basically:
If you believe in magic, you're rationally justified in thinking there was a historical resurrection
If you don't believe in magic, you're rationally justified in thinking there was no historical resurrection

And I just think that's such a fucking lukewarm take. I got no idea why Atheists and Christians alike praise him for this.