Anonymous
9/6/2025, 6:51:37 PM
No.24702961
>>24702921
I think this was one of the earliest splits we had here: some are writing for the joy of it and hope that it may ganter enough interest to make money from it, while others have money as the explicit end goal.
People who write for money think that no one could actually enjoy writing slop or see writing without an audience in mind as naive; while joy writers dislike money chasers because they turn what was an amateur space into a money scheme.
Hence the dislike for trend chasing: it's souless and floods the space with even more stories that are like you've already seen before.
I don't blame people for writing for money, though I wish more people wrote for passion. It's just that money corrupts absolutely.
>>24702946
I would say that the larger marker for Tina-writing is the "stream of counciousness" both in their posts and prose:
>Now on that note with what untenable company WG anons really are why come shit up this WNG thread. Answer. Everyone got tired of your shit and made their own sandbox.
"Answer", but no regard to proper punctuation.
> We get it. We're all "bad writers" and WG is all "good writers". Fine. We got that so you can go hoe.
"We get it" and "Fine" as if answering questions posed in their own mind.
I think this was one of the earliest splits we had here: some are writing for the joy of it and hope that it may ganter enough interest to make money from it, while others have money as the explicit end goal.
People who write for money think that no one could actually enjoy writing slop or see writing without an audience in mind as naive; while joy writers dislike money chasers because they turn what was an amateur space into a money scheme.
Hence the dislike for trend chasing: it's souless and floods the space with even more stories that are like you've already seen before.
I don't blame people for writing for money, though I wish more people wrote for passion. It's just that money corrupts absolutely.
>>24702946
I would say that the larger marker for Tina-writing is the "stream of counciousness" both in their posts and prose:
>Now on that note with what untenable company WG anons really are why come shit up this WNG thread. Answer. Everyone got tired of your shit and made their own sandbox.
"Answer", but no regard to proper punctuation.
> We get it. We're all "bad writers" and WG is all "good writers". Fine. We got that so you can go hoe.
"We get it" and "Fine" as if answering questions posed in their own mind.