Anonymous
10/14/2025, 12:27:09 AM
No.24798388
>>24798254
>It's a decent book, but it's nothing to make schizophrenic image collages over.
Cope to downplay the very real and urgent developments that image is bring to the fore.
> A "biotech created caste system" as Fukuyama describes it would only be a modern version of the Nazi's eugenics program, and the Nazis lost to democracy.
Don't make me laugh. Is that why it was the totalitarian, Russian Communist Red Army that took Berlin? Is that why the imperial western nations, who were operating under Exceptional dictatorial powers at the time, waged total war to destroy the Third Reich? You're using bad history and paving over the extremely nasty contradiction inherent within the western liberal tradition via its imperial roots to handwave that the Nazi vision was within miles of taking the Kremlin and conquering Europe. Democracy had nothing do with it, democracy 9 out of 10 times is a euphemism used by western elites to cajole the public into accepting policy decisions already made behind closed doors.
>AI is a bubble that cannot be trusted to parse a sentence, let alone control warhead.
Irony of the grammar/typographical issues in this sentence. LLM are excellent at parsing sentences, and AI has already been integrated directly into military command and control systems, with Israel using AI systems for targeting of Gazan militants. Semi-autonomous drones have been fielding for years now and have been advanced by the war in Ukraine, with full autonomous slaughterbots slated to be field this around this time this year.
>The visual navigation technology trialed by KrattWorks is the next step and an innovation that has only reached the battlefield this year. Meier expects that by the end of 2025, firms including his own will introduce fully autonomous solutions encompassing visual navigation to overcome GPS jamming, as well as terminal guidance and smart target recognition.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/ukraine-killer-drones
Alex Karp, lead of Palantir, commented upon these very developments, specifically that:
>that we are “very close” to terminator robots and at the threshold of “somewhat autonomous drones and devices like this being the most important instruments of war. You already see this in Ukraine.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/17/style/alex-karp-palantir.html
https://www.pelayoarbues.com/literature-notes/Articles/Palantir%E2%80%99s-Alex-Karp-Talks-About-War,-AI-and-America%E2%80%99s-Future---The-New-York-Times
>And the increase in drone technology only further solidifies the liberal democratic hegemony by making war impractical and more trouble than it's worth.
One, as the Ukrainian attacks on the Russian strategic nuclear bombers demonstrated, drones are making new war fighting tactics extremely asymmetrical and practical as a result, not the other way around. Secondly, China has a near monopoly in the global civilian drone production market, with their drones being instrumental on both sides of the war in Ukraine.
>It's a decent book, but it's nothing to make schizophrenic image collages over.
Cope to downplay the very real and urgent developments that image is bring to the fore.
> A "biotech created caste system" as Fukuyama describes it would only be a modern version of the Nazi's eugenics program, and the Nazis lost to democracy.
Don't make me laugh. Is that why it was the totalitarian, Russian Communist Red Army that took Berlin? Is that why the imperial western nations, who were operating under Exceptional dictatorial powers at the time, waged total war to destroy the Third Reich? You're using bad history and paving over the extremely nasty contradiction inherent within the western liberal tradition via its imperial roots to handwave that the Nazi vision was within miles of taking the Kremlin and conquering Europe. Democracy had nothing do with it, democracy 9 out of 10 times is a euphemism used by western elites to cajole the public into accepting policy decisions already made behind closed doors.
>AI is a bubble that cannot be trusted to parse a sentence, let alone control warhead.
Irony of the grammar/typographical issues in this sentence. LLM are excellent at parsing sentences, and AI has already been integrated directly into military command and control systems, with Israel using AI systems for targeting of Gazan militants. Semi-autonomous drones have been fielding for years now and have been advanced by the war in Ukraine, with full autonomous slaughterbots slated to be field this around this time this year.
>The visual navigation technology trialed by KrattWorks is the next step and an innovation that has only reached the battlefield this year. Meier expects that by the end of 2025, firms including his own will introduce fully autonomous solutions encompassing visual navigation to overcome GPS jamming, as well as terminal guidance and smart target recognition.
https://spectrum.ieee.org/ukraine-killer-drones
Alex Karp, lead of Palantir, commented upon these very developments, specifically that:
>that we are “very close” to terminator robots and at the threshold of “somewhat autonomous drones and devices like this being the most important instruments of war. You already see this in Ukraine.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/17/style/alex-karp-palantir.html
https://www.pelayoarbues.com/literature-notes/Articles/Palantir%E2%80%99s-Alex-Karp-Talks-About-War,-AI-and-America%E2%80%99s-Future---The-New-York-Times
>And the increase in drone technology only further solidifies the liberal democratic hegemony by making war impractical and more trouble than it's worth.
One, as the Ukrainian attacks on the Russian strategic nuclear bombers demonstrated, drones are making new war fighting tactics extremely asymmetrical and practical as a result, not the other way around. Secondly, China has a near monopoly in the global civilian drone production market, with their drones being instrumental on both sides of the war in Ukraine.