>>24841848
>this post coming from someone who doesn't even understand what he is reading
It's less him bashing your head over with his philosophy and more you being too much of a knucklehead to understand anything beyond a one line sentence you read on reddit, describing his works. If you read my posts on optical democracy, you'd know in your heart that you didn't have the intelligence to figure it out yourself. That speaks to your (in)ability with actual subtlety. Nothing is subtle to a retard, because he believes that nothing exists beyond his understanding, which is a laughable proposition.

I don't even have to go and justify art and its dependence on ideas. You don't even understand how ideas work to begin with.