Anonymous
10/31/2025, 3:54:14 AM
No.24843016
>>24840735
not all art revolves around building aesthetics on top of one's own primitive, meaningless reproductive urges, as i said in this thread already. but even if did, that would just mean most men, including the artist himself, are philistines
see, just because a man is good a crafting things, it doesn't mean his soul is developed—were that the case, we'd ascribe aesthetic value to the work of computer scientists, for instance. one can be merely developed as regards craftsmanship, technique; while being stunted as regards sensibility
and if your aesthetic appreciation of women isn't tied to your apish impetus to fuck, then why do you call men who have actual aesthetic sensibilities—as opposed to being lust driven—gay? do you not see how you contradic yourself here?
not all art revolves around building aesthetics on top of one's own primitive, meaningless reproductive urges, as i said in this thread already. but even if did, that would just mean most men, including the artist himself, are philistines
see, just because a man is good a crafting things, it doesn't mean his soul is developed—were that the case, we'd ascribe aesthetic value to the work of computer scientists, for instance. one can be merely developed as regards craftsmanship, technique; while being stunted as regards sensibility
and if your aesthetic appreciation of women isn't tied to your apish impetus to fuck, then why do you call men who have actual aesthetic sensibilities—as opposed to being lust driven—gay? do you not see how you contradic yourself here?