Anonymous
10/31/2025, 1:06:23 PM
No.24843756
>>24843666
A good question, but those 100 books probably build on top of each other in some manner let’s say (not starting at the beginning)!Descartes to Locke and Newton. Locke and Newton to Hume. Hume to Kant. Kant (and Jakob Boehme) to Hegel, Fichte, Schelling. Schopenhauer then NEETzsche Marx Stirner up to Wittgenstein to Deleuze etc, study this evolution of refutations and affirmations. So, whoever you find to be the last important writer in your eyes, look, see where you disagree, see where you agree, or where you find their flaws in writing and accentuate on this and build upon this yourself. Give your own answer on whatever questions are postulated these doctrines in same goes for prose writers and their writing techniques. Subversion in literature is one of the many things that shape our being, though it may be hackneyed, every eminent writer seems to attempt to subvert the last. If there’s one thing many seem to have in common though, it’s their own unwavering dogmatism in search for objective knowledge (yet another facet of our ontological evolution). Goes without saying but this requires you to utilise your creativity to the best of your ability. Fortunately for me I’m not a writer however nor do I aspire to be so I don’t have to worry about all that haha!
A good question, but those 100 books probably build on top of each other in some manner let’s say (not starting at the beginning)!Descartes to Locke and Newton. Locke and Newton to Hume. Hume to Kant. Kant (and Jakob Boehme) to Hegel, Fichte, Schelling. Schopenhauer then NEETzsche Marx Stirner up to Wittgenstein to Deleuze etc, study this evolution of refutations and affirmations. So, whoever you find to be the last important writer in your eyes, look, see where you disagree, see where you agree, or where you find their flaws in writing and accentuate on this and build upon this yourself. Give your own answer on whatever questions are postulated these doctrines in same goes for prose writers and their writing techniques. Subversion in literature is one of the many things that shape our being, though it may be hackneyed, every eminent writer seems to attempt to subvert the last. If there’s one thing many seem to have in common though, it’s their own unwavering dogmatism in search for objective knowledge (yet another facet of our ontological evolution). Goes without saying but this requires you to utilise your creativity to the best of your ability. Fortunately for me I’m not a writer however nor do I aspire to be so I don’t have to worry about all that haha!