Anonymous
11/1/2025, 3:51:57 PM
No.24846892
>>24846883
>The chain of causality ends
Nope. It transforms. The cells in your body are using amino acids from dead people bodies' in the past. The chain of causality goes on. It's just one type of concept (a personal life embodied in a single coherent body) that ended.
>And are you fulfilled by that which works ?
Sometimes. Fulfillment isn't the argument on my end.
>What is it that proves it to be a Non sequitur or just an unwise choice of words
It's a non sequitur because it doesn't follow. That my definition is not complete doesn't mean it's not true. Otherwise your objection, which omits thousands of aspects of what I said, would be untrue.
>The chain of causality ends
Nope. It transforms. The cells in your body are using amino acids from dead people bodies' in the past. The chain of causality goes on. It's just one type of concept (a personal life embodied in a single coherent body) that ended.
>And are you fulfilled by that which works ?
Sometimes. Fulfillment isn't the argument on my end.
>What is it that proves it to be a Non sequitur or just an unwise choice of words
It's a non sequitur because it doesn't follow. That my definition is not complete doesn't mean it's not true. Otherwise your objection, which omits thousands of aspects of what I said, would be untrue.