>>24846904
>There you answered your question
My question was "where did you learn that 'there is no heading somewhere'?" My answer was that specific concepts may end, which answers a different question altogether. So where did you learn that 'there is no heading somewhere'?
>>which omits thousands of aspects of what I said
>I think we agree to disagree
You disagree that your objections only select a few aspects of my speech? Surely you don't think your objection addresses my spelling, my choice of spacing, the etymology of my word choice, the political mindset associated with my position.... there are thousands of aspects of my posts that are left untouched. And that is fine. As long as you don't argue that completeness is the pre-requisite for truth.