Anonymous
11/1/2025, 4:28:31 PM
No.24846972
>>24846915
>>There you answered your question
>From realizing that when you do a thing or an action and that thing or action is fulfilled or done, The chain of causality ends and therefore something must be done afterwards
I already stated and won't state again but to make it more clear on why I mentioned your fallacies
You said
>It transforms.
Which indicates a present relativity of the thing which is universally acceptable and I won't go into further refuting
>The cells in your body
I'm talking about the Individual's subjective existence, His own phenomena is not of interest because it submits to the Principium Individuationis (Space,Time and Causality) which dictate the phenomena (And i'm not here stating blatant information but building up on your premise so you can see the chain of logical reaction that indicate that there is nothing)
>It's just one type of concept (a personal life embodied in a single coherent body) that ended.
Here you state that it ended which itself states that there is an end to that concept which has run its course, So by that premise let's return to the cells that are using the amino acid, They're constantly on a chain of causality to transform into an idea which will become the plural body or the food of the other things.
So by that logic it is only constituted for what is being held in that specific timing that posits for space to accumulate for causality to create such event, But such event is only active for that circumstance thus the only somewhere which you speak of (which definitely is from a theological ground) is the idea or the plural objective idea
>>There you answered your question
>From realizing that when you do a thing or an action and that thing or action is fulfilled or done, The chain of causality ends and therefore something must be done afterwards
I already stated and won't state again but to make it more clear on why I mentioned your fallacies
You said
>It transforms.
Which indicates a present relativity of the thing which is universally acceptable and I won't go into further refuting
>The cells in your body
I'm talking about the Individual's subjective existence, His own phenomena is not of interest because it submits to the Principium Individuationis (Space,Time and Causality) which dictate the phenomena (And i'm not here stating blatant information but building up on your premise so you can see the chain of logical reaction that indicate that there is nothing)
>It's just one type of concept (a personal life embodied in a single coherent body) that ended.
Here you state that it ended which itself states that there is an end to that concept which has run its course, So by that premise let's return to the cells that are using the amino acid, They're constantly on a chain of causality to transform into an idea which will become the plural body or the food of the other things.
So by that logic it is only constituted for what is being held in that specific timing that posits for space to accumulate for causality to create such event, But such event is only active for that circumstance thus the only somewhere which you speak of (which definitely is from a theological ground) is the idea or the plural objective idea