Anonymous
8/11/2025, 5:30:29 PM
No.127361315
>>127359829
>It is unfair to compare an album of the 1960s with an album of the 1990s (or, worse, later). In the old days it was expensive to make an album, hence musicians would make one only when they had a lot of material and could select the best of the best. The vast majority of their output was left unreleased. As the cost of making a disc decreased, musicians started releasing everything they compose. Inevitably, the average quality of an album has decreased.
Also that is false, 60s music just as much averaged 10 filler tracks for every good song.
>It is unfair to compare an album of the 1960s with an album of the 1990s (or, worse, later). In the old days it was expensive to make an album, hence musicians would make one only when they had a lot of material and could select the best of the best. The vast majority of their output was left unreleased. As the cost of making a disc decreased, musicians started releasing everything they compose. Inevitably, the average quality of an album has decreased.
Also that is false, 60s music just as much averaged 10 filler tracks for every good song.