>>2051272
It's motorism. End of the discussion.
Long story:
The so called 'e-bike' (it's a moped, compound noun, motor & pedal) is a false flag operation conducted by the motorist. The motorist aims to achieve several goals with it:
First the motorist managed successfully to muddy the water to as what a motorvehicle, or a bicycle, is in the collective conscious and legal definitions.
Building on this the motorist now uses this motorvehicle to invade spaces beyond the motorist inclusion zone, even spaces specifically meant to protect people from the motorist.
This aims to do two things:
Normalize the use of motorvehicles beyond the cager inclusion zone.
And also create disturbance which can now be framed as the cyclists actions.
The motorist will use this moped to ride on the sidewalk, run over people, block the road, block cycling paths, invade pedestrian areas, commit various crimes using it to get away, destroy natural habitats, violate traffic rules... the list goes on.
That being said the electric moped, if designed sensible and not as sometimes, intentionally inefficient, also has benefits: It is by far more efficient, energy extensive and environmentally friendly than a man on a bicycle. The CO2 equivalent of the emissions associated with the production of the added parts is made up for in short order of using it over a bicycle.
This about sums up the impact those developments have on others.
Motorism also has an impact on the motorist. Motorism is not only an expression of mental and physical inadequacy, it is a downwards spiral. It breeds complacency, indifference, alienation, isolation, physical decay and erodes all resilience.
Sure it may be a neccessity for some, like cripples, senior citizenz, women, children and other degenerates and qe are partly to blame. We have made a world that they have to inhabit and in order to participate it is sometimes neccessary for those who lack physical and emotional strength to use such moxes of transportation.
(...)