>>28492023
it was dodge v ford motor co. often cited as a legal precedent of maximising shareholder wealth but it's really just saying a company can't act against the interests of its shareholders, but they can act in ways that justify long term interests of shareholders. shlensky v wrigley is a case that many people see as that of moving away from the "line must go up" mindset that many people saw the dodge v ford case as upholding