>>4456997
>Bokeh is the opposite of creative. "Just blur everything out/im not adding light".
You are genuinely retarded. ANY form of control of how the resulting image looks is creative control.
>Myth. Negative dehaze, blur filters, etc. People even did this on film by doing a double exposure slightly out of focus to btfo every "character prime".
Prove that a Helios-44 renders the same as a Sony GM 50. You can't, because
>Add vignetting in post
Vignetting is not just falloff.
>Add softness in post
Post-processed softness does not mimic real spherical aberration.
>Creative people add light
Yeah sure, let me just take my phone flashlight out and point it at the mountain in front of me during dusk. That'll work.
>Focal lengths are for perspective and first and framing second
Yes, and zooms let you choose your perspective and framing from a stationary position. This is supposed to refute me how?
>"Rendering" does not exist outside of how swirly the bokeh is, and high end photographers have been religiously avoiding bokeh for the past 80 years.
>You mean the thing that can decided in post?
I'll say it again, you're genuinely retarded.