Anonymous
8/22/2025, 7:49:31 PM
No.4461799
>>4461755
I think you're absolutely right. Furthermore, I think there are other fads that can be explained by the want to move away from "smartphone looking" photos. If you look OP's pic and then compare to the one I posted here >>4461723
you can see that there is absolutely zero background separation on the latter, whereas the former was probably shot at f/5.6 or 6.3. I think introducing shallower depths of field into photos or genres that may have neglected such a device is a modern trend, as its something that small sensor smartphones inherently struggle with.
I think you're absolutely right. Furthermore, I think there are other fads that can be explained by the want to move away from "smartphone looking" photos. If you look OP's pic and then compare to the one I posted here >>4461723
you can see that there is absolutely zero background separation on the latter, whereas the former was probably shot at f/5.6 or 6.3. I think introducing shallower depths of field into photos or genres that may have neglected such a device is a modern trend, as its something that small sensor smartphones inherently struggle with.