Anonymous
8/22/2025, 7:54:37 PM
No.4461802
>>4461773
If we define "fake shit" as something that looks unnatural, or now how we humans see it through our eyes, then you could say a huge portion of photography is "fake shit". Human eyes can't really render a shallow depth of field, they can't see really far away compressed objects up close like you can with a telephoto lens, you can't see super super wide like you can with a circular fisheye. I don't think something looking fake inherently makes it shit, so long as the photographer can explain it and accommodate it into their coherent artistic vision for the photo.
If we define "fake shit" as something that looks unnatural, or now how we humans see it through our eyes, then you could say a huge portion of photography is "fake shit". Human eyes can't really render a shallow depth of field, they can't see really far away compressed objects up close like you can with a telephoto lens, you can't see super super wide like you can with a circular fisheye. I don't think something looking fake inherently makes it shit, so long as the photographer can explain it and accommodate it into their coherent artistic vision for the photo.