Anonymous
10/28/2025, 9:58:52 PM
No.4478533
>>4478532
Oh, so you personally disliking it means it is bad. Figured that was the case. Seems to always be the case on /p/.
I think it is nicely balanced, well lit, texturally, and tonally rich. It is also meaningless eye candy, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
The meaning of a photo is entirely irrelevant on /p/. Visual interest and/or an adherence to the rules of photography or an appeal to specific and autistic taste by the individual nophoto is what makes a good /p/hoto.
If you say a photo has meaning you get laughed at. You a gay clown or something?
My dog is whiter than you are btw. Teehee. Post wrist, fag.
Oh, so you personally disliking it means it is bad. Figured that was the case. Seems to always be the case on /p/.
I think it is nicely balanced, well lit, texturally, and tonally rich. It is also meaningless eye candy, but that isn't necessarily a bad thing.
The meaning of a photo is entirely irrelevant on /p/. Visual interest and/or an adherence to the rules of photography or an appeal to specific and autistic taste by the individual nophoto is what makes a good /p/hoto.
If you say a photo has meaning you get laughed at. You a gay clown or something?
My dog is whiter than you are btw. Teehee. Post wrist, fag.