Anonymous
(ID: EvYEOPHW)
6/17/2025, 5:51:10 AM
No.507683736
6/17/2025, 5:51:10 AM
No.507683736
>>507680633
>I don't argue I just meme or insult
>now you need to argue or else
There is not a single version of the nuclear hoax but multiple ones!
How can I argue when I'm told atomic bombs are a hoax but the hydrogen bombs are real by one person, and by another one that all nukes are fakes?
Or that some fallout are fake and by another one that some are real?
Etc!
Do you realise there is no concensus between each one of you and your different thesis and that if I don't believe enterely one of your version the other person with a different version of the nuke hoax will jump at my throat saying stupidities like you are a vaxx tard or a jeet?
For fucks sake do a meeting, get your shit together, confront each of your theories and bring a single good nuke-hoax theory because you are all shitting everywhere and touching everything it's annoying as fuck.
I've heard like 5 different nuke hoax theories that contradict each other at one point or another during my researchs.
>I don't argue I just meme or insult
>now you need to argue or else
There is not a single version of the nuclear hoax but multiple ones!
How can I argue when I'm told atomic bombs are a hoax but the hydrogen bombs are real by one person, and by another one that all nukes are fakes?
Or that some fallout are fake and by another one that some are real?
Etc!
Do you realise there is no concensus between each one of you and your different thesis and that if I don't believe enterely one of your version the other person with a different version of the nuke hoax will jump at my throat saying stupidities like you are a vaxx tard or a jeet?
For fucks sake do a meeting, get your shit together, confront each of your theories and bring a single good nuke-hoax theory because you are all shitting everywhere and touching everything it's annoying as fuck.
I've heard like 5 different nuke hoax theories that contradict each other at one point or another during my researchs.