Anonymous
(ID: Y1hQQKWx)
6/25/2025, 8:04:34 PM
No.508709840
6/25/2025, 8:04:34 PM
No.508709840
>>508709208
>I don't rely on the historical or mythological claims of any text.
that is very convenient if you want to criticize christianity while pretending to offer an alternative that when examined turns out to be nothing at all. >>508709208
>I don't need Nag Hammadi texts to be reliable.
>>508709208
>Gnosticism does not offer the same explanation. Abrahamism believes that this world is part of God's good plan and that all of its shit mechanics were created expressly by God. Abrahamism never says that the Devil created any of it.
it explicitly says the devil rebelled with a third of the angels in revelation and is working against gods plan (though he is ultimately a part of that plan being omnipotent and omniscient naturally lend to situations like this)
>>508709208
>Yes, the thing who created this fucked up place is evil.
this place is fucked up and evil and wonderful at the same time, you must ignore the vast beauty present in gods creation to justify your world view which cannot be falsified because you refuse to claim any scripture
side note several months ago this year i pretended to be a fag in a thread with pagans and gnostics i said "all i really care about religously speaking is my ability to have gay anonymous sex in public bathrooms with other dudes, would paganism or gnosticism be better for my needs" i thought i was so over the top with it you kike shills would instantly see what i was doing, i had a lot to learn, instead both gnostics and pagan shills tried to court me to their side and i asked if there was any gnostic literature i could read to know more about it they instantly reccomended the nag hammadi librarys for the first time after a full year of arguing with so called gnostics when i revealed id read the libraries you kikes realized who i was and deleted the thread right away
>I don't rely on the historical or mythological claims of any text.
that is very convenient if you want to criticize christianity while pretending to offer an alternative that when examined turns out to be nothing at all. >>508709208
>I don't need Nag Hammadi texts to be reliable.
>>508709208
>Gnosticism does not offer the same explanation. Abrahamism believes that this world is part of God's good plan and that all of its shit mechanics were created expressly by God. Abrahamism never says that the Devil created any of it.
it explicitly says the devil rebelled with a third of the angels in revelation and is working against gods plan (though he is ultimately a part of that plan being omnipotent and omniscient naturally lend to situations like this)
>>508709208
>Yes, the thing who created this fucked up place is evil.
this place is fucked up and evil and wonderful at the same time, you must ignore the vast beauty present in gods creation to justify your world view which cannot be falsified because you refuse to claim any scripture
side note several months ago this year i pretended to be a fag in a thread with pagans and gnostics i said "all i really care about religously speaking is my ability to have gay anonymous sex in public bathrooms with other dudes, would paganism or gnosticism be better for my needs" i thought i was so over the top with it you kike shills would instantly see what i was doing, i had a lot to learn, instead both gnostics and pagan shills tried to court me to their side and i asked if there was any gnostic literature i could read to know more about it they instantly reccomended the nag hammadi librarys for the first time after a full year of arguing with so called gnostics when i revealed id read the libraries you kikes realized who i was and deleted the thread right away