Anonymous
(ID: kRz8UCAX)
6/25/2025, 8:43:42 PM
No.508713256
6/25/2025, 8:43:42 PM
No.508713256
>>508712132
Anon, I’m not lying. I know far more about this than you do. I’ve read the “foundational” papers these faggots wrote back in the 90s that started this mess. I’ve seen how they cherry picked their data, played games with the statistics and p-hacked the shit out of it until they “found” a signal in the data. I saw them pull the “fact” that tree ring widths correlate to temperature straight out of their hairy assholes and use that to rewrite the historical temperature narrative. And then constantly rewrite the historical temp record that was based on thermometer readings to “fix” it so it supported their narrative. I’ve read the Climategate emails where they admit to colluding to alter the data, hide results that didn’t fit the narrative, and shut out anyone not following the script.
I know that the physics behind their claims is flat out wrong, because the greenhouse effect due to CO2 is logarithmic, not exponential or even linear. What they claim is simply not physically possible.
I’ve seen their dogshit Global Climate Models that are so bad they can’t even hindcast. What that means is if you start the models running in 1940 and adjust for the way conditions changed they do not produce current climate conditions when you run them forward. And this is what they are basing all of their predictions on. Not science, but the output of models they know don’t work.
And they lie through their fucking teeth about the accuracy of their results, when the margin of error on their measurements and outputs is an order of magnitude higher than the values they claim to be measuring. In any actual science that would lead to the results being dismissed out of hand because they’re meaningless. But not in climate “science.”
Every prediction has failed for 30 years. The conditions predicted by their models do not occur in the real world.
It’s pure junk science.
Anon, I’m not lying. I know far more about this than you do. I’ve read the “foundational” papers these faggots wrote back in the 90s that started this mess. I’ve seen how they cherry picked their data, played games with the statistics and p-hacked the shit out of it until they “found” a signal in the data. I saw them pull the “fact” that tree ring widths correlate to temperature straight out of their hairy assholes and use that to rewrite the historical temperature narrative. And then constantly rewrite the historical temp record that was based on thermometer readings to “fix” it so it supported their narrative. I’ve read the Climategate emails where they admit to colluding to alter the data, hide results that didn’t fit the narrative, and shut out anyone not following the script.
I know that the physics behind their claims is flat out wrong, because the greenhouse effect due to CO2 is logarithmic, not exponential or even linear. What they claim is simply not physically possible.
I’ve seen their dogshit Global Climate Models that are so bad they can’t even hindcast. What that means is if you start the models running in 1940 and adjust for the way conditions changed they do not produce current climate conditions when you run them forward. And this is what they are basing all of their predictions on. Not science, but the output of models they know don’t work.
And they lie through their fucking teeth about the accuracy of their results, when the margin of error on their measurements and outputs is an order of magnitude higher than the values they claim to be measuring. In any actual science that would lead to the results being dismissed out of hand because they’re meaningless. But not in climate “science.”
Every prediction has failed for 30 years. The conditions predicted by their models do not occur in the real world.
It’s pure junk science.