Anonymous
(ID: hElEwoWG)
6/25/2025, 9:11:36 PM
No.508715733
6/25/2025, 9:11:36 PM
No.508715733
Hold on just a moment here.
This guy is all like >>508710092 and >>508711196 here celebrating promiscuous men (like "him").
But anons basically refuse to argue within "his" retarded framing, realizing it's just unprovable horseshit meant to deliberately put "him" in a position where "he" can patronize and preen and play reverse psychology, where "he" doesn't care even as "he" makes the majority of the posts ITT. And since no one is biting, "he" suddenly pulls a 180 to do what the article does, except even worse, where "he" makes the ridiculous claim that >>508713053 it's the fault of men for the state of women and calls "his" earlier behavior being a promiscuous fuckboy. And also suddenly there is actually no problem and men totally are still dating women, but that usual routine runs a bit thin when the entire thread is about an article stating it is a problem.
Notice how the positions shift from post to post just in a desire to "win" the argument. Pretty familiar to us who've dated psycho bitches, huh?
Behold, the mind of woman. It's never her fault. I can't think of a better QED demonstration of the worldview embodied in the article than this perfect display of its solipsism.
This guy is all like >>508710092 and >>508711196 here celebrating promiscuous men (like "him").
But anons basically refuse to argue within "his" retarded framing, realizing it's just unprovable horseshit meant to deliberately put "him" in a position where "he" can patronize and preen and play reverse psychology, where "he" doesn't care even as "he" makes the majority of the posts ITT. And since no one is biting, "he" suddenly pulls a 180 to do what the article does, except even worse, where "he" makes the ridiculous claim that >>508713053 it's the fault of men for the state of women and calls "his" earlier behavior being a promiscuous fuckboy. And also suddenly there is actually no problem and men totally are still dating women, but that usual routine runs a bit thin when the entire thread is about an article stating it is a problem.
Notice how the positions shift from post to post just in a desire to "win" the argument. Pretty familiar to us who've dated psycho bitches, huh?
Behold, the mind of woman. It's never her fault. I can't think of a better QED demonstration of the worldview embodied in the article than this perfect display of its solipsism.