>>508715733
> Notice how the positions shift from post to post just in a desire to "win" the argument. Pretty familiar to us who've dated psycho bitches, huh?
It’s because he’s working off a decision tree
>if
>then
>else if
Likely written by a DEI hire, With the purpose of concensus cracking. Glowniggers still haven’t got the memo after all these years, /pol/ is immune to consensus cracking