>>508736153
Yes, but now you see the downside of the human limitation and why AI as a tool is valuable. If we can get to a point where the aesthetic combination is just as good, if not better than what the artist was trying to create, than that artist can create more art. It allows them to expand their horizon, no longer does their art have to be a piece of digital existence only, they get an opportunity to expand upon in new ways, create a meta narrative around it, build it into an IP if they want, build it into a side project, make a universe, create a great ideal of expression. It removes monotony of drawing lines and strokes, it creates greater opportunity for human cooperation to curate better aesthetics if incubated in the correct environment. These are all value positive.

>>508736172
Sure, there are plenty of people that don't have distinct ideas or images in their heads and there are some people that are. This is something that already exist in the world and doesn't matter. The ideal is that we are able to get AI more curated and accurate towards a particular artist desire to express. This is the path forward, whether you like it or not.