>>508733488
Makes you wonder why they saw that interesting percentage difference in the study they reference and didn't include it in their questions.

When I see studies that are prompted by the government they always seem to have the conclusion first, then see the stats and have their hand forced into it being balanced.
E.g.
>Society may have overestimated risk of the ‘manosphere’, UK researchers say - The Guardian
>The Guardian

Albeit that one had a pitiful sample size.

Not an incel by the way if this matches it into your database ofcom