Anonymous
(ID: 7M4cM9ei)
6/26/2025, 3:10:55 AM
No.508745255
6/26/2025, 3:10:55 AM
No.508745255
>>508744339
a. you gotta dig up everywhere to lay them
b. you need safety valves and alarms on them
c. you need pressurised pure nitrogen available, the handling and storage of which is itself dangerous
d. you need blast protection around your stations in case of ruptures
e. you need some method built into the systems to equalize the pressures in your lines should one of them develop a leak
Theoretically yes. But as I mentioned above, there's costs.
This is the problem:
"Why don't you just build entire new network of stuff bro?"
My own company went fucking bankrupt deploying smart meters you daft bastard. As did several other UK energy companies. Shit costs money and companies need to make a profit. You can't make £120m a year profit when the government tells you to spend £3billion replacing everyone's fucking meter.
GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS, YANKS
a. you gotta dig up everywhere to lay them
b. you need safety valves and alarms on them
c. you need pressurised pure nitrogen available, the handling and storage of which is itself dangerous
d. you need blast protection around your stations in case of ruptures
e. you need some method built into the systems to equalize the pressures in your lines should one of them develop a leak
Theoretically yes. But as I mentioned above, there's costs.
This is the problem:
"Why don't you just build entire new network of stuff bro?"
My own company went fucking bankrupt deploying smart meters you daft bastard. As did several other UK energy companies. Shit costs money and companies need to make a profit. You can't make £120m a year profit when the government tells you to spend £3billion replacing everyone's fucking meter.
GET THAT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS, YANKS