Anonymous
(ID: axevPJCP)
6/26/2025, 3:40:06 AM
No.508747272
6/26/2025, 3:40:06 AM
No.508747272
>>508746458
the fact that it's used universally in science tells you all which works better.
Unless you want to defy cartesian standard physics model (which you should) and point that natural processes can only be computed using complex numbers maffs (i e: real numbers=imaginary; imaginary numbers=real)
the fact that it's used universally in science tells you all which works better.
Unless you want to defy cartesian standard physics model (which you should) and point that natural processes can only be computed using complex numbers maffs (i e: real numbers=imaginary; imaginary numbers=real)