Anonymous
(ID: PIOKCIoW)
6/26/2025, 3:41:56 AM
No.508747386
6/26/2025, 3:41:56 AM
No.508747386
>>508733110
Lol. Even if we were to pretend you or he were speaking in earnest, this would mean you'd support the destruction of their nuclear facilities and the decimation of their top military staff. If his stance was "no invasion" then that stance has been fulfilled since there is no invasion. Why, then, is Hasan on Iran's side when that's against what you claim his interest is?
Lol. Even if we were to pretend you or he were speaking in earnest, this would mean you'd support the destruction of their nuclear facilities and the decimation of their top military staff. If his stance was "no invasion" then that stance has been fulfilled since there is no invasion. Why, then, is Hasan on Iran's side when that's against what you claim his interest is?