Anonymous
(ID: tqCdmJsh)
6/26/2025, 9:14:19 AM
No.508765766
6/26/2025, 9:14:19 AM
No.508765766
>>508765647
The evidence is there.
Here's another link directly debunking OP's claim
https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/holocaust-falsehood-resurfaces-amid-rise-in-anti-semitism/
>Historian Sebastian Farre12, who has researched the history of the Red Cross and Nazi concentration camp detainees, told AAP FactCheck that revisionist literature selectively used information that suited an agenda.
>This was done "without conducting a scientific analysis of the origins of these sources and the context in which they were produced, particularly refusing to compare them with the vast body of information produced by the Red Cross and the documents preserved in Arolsen," he said.
The evidence is there.
Here's another link directly debunking OP's claim
https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/holocaust-falsehood-resurfaces-amid-rise-in-anti-semitism/
>Historian Sebastian Farre12, who has researched the history of the Red Cross and Nazi concentration camp detainees, told AAP FactCheck that revisionist literature selectively used information that suited an agenda.
>This was done "without conducting a scientific analysis of the origins of these sources and the context in which they were produced, particularly refusing to compare them with the vast body of information produced by the Red Cross and the documents preserved in Arolsen," he said.