>>508775392
>sdny would refuse to prosecute
lol you say this despite having zero clue as to what would be the crimes involved.
Do you work for the sdny? Do you know them personally? Why would you say they would not do something when you don't know for sure?
>fixate on hillary
No, I'm pointing out that Trump will never seek to prosecute powerful people or hold them accountable in any way.
hillary is just one example where Trump has publicly said his reasons for not going after someone he sees as a member of his peer group.
>root of the problem
If you ignore everything on your way to root out corruption, you are a blind idiot who lets everyone get away with everything.
You'd make a terrible prosecutor but a great shill for deliberately misunderstanding what I have been saying.