>>508779489
This new statement of yours was stupid again, but the previous one was surprisingly substantial. Your sane observation, that agencies theoretically responsible for public health release and promote obvious bioweapon is one of direct evidence for existence of 'conspiracy' scenario that was rejected so hard in here by many. You finally paid attention to real problem, probably by accident, but still, you managed to contribute to discussion, for the first time, so far. Congrats.