Anonymous
(ID: rSYUxnqC)
7/22/2025, 7:08:12 PM
No.511061737
7/22/2025, 7:08:12 PM
No.511061737
>>511061424
The Supreme Court has held that police officers do not have a constitutional duty to protect individuals from harm.
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1989): The Court held that the state had no duty to protect a child from his abusive father, even though the state was aware of the abuse.
Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005): The Court ruled that police had no constitutional duty to enforce a restraining order, even when the woman repeatedly requested their help after her estranged husband violated it.
Cops have no duty to protect you.
That is simply not their job.
The Supreme Court has held that police officers do not have a constitutional duty to protect individuals from harm.
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services (1989): The Court held that the state had no duty to protect a child from his abusive father, even though the state was aware of the abuse.
Castle Rock v. Gonzales (2005): The Court ruled that police had no constitutional duty to enforce a restraining order, even when the woman repeatedly requested their help after her estranged husband violated it.
Cops have no duty to protect you.
That is simply not their job.