>>511155266
It's not really addressed. It mentions the Russian DNC/Clinton hack, but downplays it significantly relying on the apparent "low confidence" at the time (an assessment later changed to "high confidence" in 2017 more rigorous technical analysis by the feds & private security firms).

I don't agree with the FISA warrants, but it's natural to conclude that Russia therefore attempted to meddle in the election.

Whether it favored one candidate or another is pedantry. Obama was will within his right to be concerned.

I don't agree at all with the FISA warrants. I don't agree at all that this was handled perfectly.

But a criminal investigation is totally laughable and will go nowhere. I honestly hope they do it, as it might be healthy for the public to refresh their collective memory on what exactly happened and who was responsible, though I think rehashing this won't fare well for Russia on the the American public's opinion of the war. Just be careful what you wish for.