>>512508281
>If you are a high value male, you literally don't need to do shit to women and they will do whatever it takes to get your attention. And the moment you give them attention, they will make a shittest to see if you react for their need of more attention and they will see it as weakness and will gaslight themselves in order to start the monkeybranching process.
We're moving topics here to single interactions im talking groups. But yeah i've been well polished before, you can do literally anything except starting to simp I've made the most ridiculous demands and rules to get them to fuck off and they instead just do it.
>The problem with your line of thinking is that your approach tries to give positive reinforcement to women through adhering to a certain ideology, like using pavlovian conditioning on a dog.
What you fail to realize is that unlike women, dogs are loyal.
Okay assuming you are right How has culture changed women? Whats the difference between woman from the 50's the 80's and today that grew up with social media What conditioned or unconditioned them? Why cant groups of men do this on purpose?
>Notice how the biggest discussions and conversations between these totally trad women is who is fucking who, STDs and the size of wedding rings
Yup but cant this be used or moved to something useful? I think a useful framework can be made of this by men for women to live in and follow.
>Stop being obtuse.
Im a bit stupid and get stuck on things it wont change.